Imagining the Tenth Dimension part 2 of 2
You should follow this project on twitter: twitter.com Watch the new annotated version: www.youtube.com This is the second part of the animation illustrating the concepts found in chapter one of the book “Imagining the Tenth Dimension – a new way of thinking about time and space” by Rob Bryanton, from tenthdimension.com full version one.revver.com
| - If you like us then share us! |
So in the 2 dimension is like old fashion mario
so in 6th dimension, everything exists at once at one time?
sort of hard to picture
So by the existence of the 7th dimension , things that are not real , could be real , eg superman or star wars?
So in the 10th dimension everything is real and exists at the same time?
Wait a minute… What prevents a 3 dimensional object from using a different set of 3 dimensions other than our own to create a 3d line, and by extension another dimension as the progression of time and so on and so forth? Also, wouldn’t you be able to build other 10 dimensional spaces from completely unrelated dimensions? The tenth dimension would only be the relative limit of human relevance,right?
Wait a minute… What prevents a 3 dimensional object from using a different set of 3 dimensions other than our own to create a 3d line, and by extension another dimension as the progression of time and so on and so forth? Also, wouldn’t you be able to build other 10 dimensional spaces from completely unrelated dimensions? The tenth dimension would only be the relative limit of human relevance, wouldn’t it?
Wait a minute… What prevents a 3 dimensional object from using a different set of 3 dimensions other than our own to create a 3d line, and by extension another dimension as the progression of time and so on and so forth? Also, wouldn’t you be able to build other 10 dimensional spaces from completely unrelated dimensions? The tenth dimension would only be the relative limit of human relevance, wouldn’t it?
Isn’t this where the M-Theory comes in??
I thought space-time eliminated the possibility of time being the 4th dimension?
what the?!……. im fourteen years old and my mind has been raped… oh well im just going to go with our universe is the only universe
lol he kept repeating hmself over and over. the final demention is 5. also your concepts of what the dimensions are is garbage. 4th dimension in string theory is the ability to pass thru other solid objects as thou your non existant.
@Ryotphoenixwing I think we all have.. Makes more sense the more you look into it, though.
@NaacnudsProductions hell would break loose if time travel was discovered.
I just got mind fucked….
Watching this when you are half asleep is not a good idea.
@axlfanatic2 same here, same here 8).
Placing any measurement upon infinity, makes it no longer infinite.
I live in the 13 dimension, which loops back to the first dimension, after all possible dimensions have reversed order to become the space surrounding the dot, which becomes the dot again, into infinity, which is never measurable, except that you become retarded in math.
@Toxer90034 Time travel is to dangerous!
She said infinity is a great place to start, oh yeah.
@NaacnudsProductions
You have stated that because “time” is a line, then we can’t have different initial conditions.
But this seems to be an issue only when we assume there is one and only one line for everything,
which really comes from the belief that time is in and of itself and that all things conform to it (as if the line comes first).
However, staying more true to the vid’s model, the use of a “line” is relative to the “actual” property it describes !
Simply put: all things get a line.
@10thdim wow you are the first person to understand that concept that have ever heard of! I’ve been trying to teach the fact that time travel is in fact easily possible and that by going back in time you would inexplicable not effect anything in your universe…so long as you could get back that is. it is a quite easy solution around all the time parodoxes and therefore aloows time-travel to remain in the realm of possiblity!!!
if there was nothing before the big bang then that doens not mean that there was not and infinite amount of years with nothing happening before it. therefore the “seventh” demension (as demonstrated by this video)could easily be defined under the 6th demesion. and then from there you have no starting point for the 8th or 9th or 10th demension so try again. I’ve been stuck on trying to crack the 7th demension for years and it doesn’t quite work that way… good video pretty convincing!
@Toxer90034
You would not remember meeting yourself because it did not happen to you, but of your genetic equivalent in other dimension. Time Travel is based on “sliding” through parallel universes, where the decisions of your other self are different creating different alternate realities; so when you travel through time (5th dimension) and you meet your boyhood genetic equivalent then this is really not you as this person followed a different 4th dimensional path as you did to meet him
@Toxer90034
You would not remember meeting yourself because it did not happen to you, but of your genetic equivalent in other dimension. Time Travel is based on “sliding” through parallel universes, where the decisions of your other self are different creating different alternate realities; so when you travel through time (5th dimension) and you meet your boyhood genetic equivalent then this is really not you as this person followed a different 4th dimensional path as you did to meet him.
My reason for this is because a line extends infinitaly in all directions. saying there was a “Big Bang” where there was nothing in all the universe and then there was something in all the universe. (even that is exeptable) than you would still have an infinite amount of space in all directions there is just nothing filling it yet. the same goes with time.
(pardon my spelling, I don’t do language very well.) So… up to the part about the 6th demension everything is totally acceptable, however;during the transition between the 6th and the seventh demension I have notices a major flaw. if your saying that time is a line then you can’t say that you can have different initial conditions.
@crawlFace
then you’ll return to what you believe is the original state of your present where you originally left, but it is not!
Everything can easily be just like it was in the original state, and you may resume your life, but nothing can change the fact that it is a new line that you are quantifying, and on the original line you cease to quantify energy and will appear to remain gone,
or perhaps the original line “collapses” so to speak or transforms/superimposes with the new line?
@crawlFace
Reminder, yes it is theoretical, and here are some issues with “occupying” positions that you could have chosen but didn’t:
In the present line where you “left” to go back to the past, you would remain gone, never to return again!
Those people on that line will never see you again, no matter what.
And in the new line of you that goes to the past, you’ll do what you planned to do in the past, and…